Letters: Good thing private citizen was armed

Letters: Good thing private citizen was armed
Bank Image

The shooter in the Indiana mall was stopped by a legally armed private citizen after the shooter had killed three people and injured two more.

The irony is that the mall prohibited the presence of firearms on the property. If the armed citizen had adhered to that policy, how many more would have been killed or injured?

The places most likely to be designated gun-free zones are the places most likely to encounter the nuts with the intent to commit mass murder.

Property owners have the right to restrict firearms on their property. Citizens have the right to protect themselves. So, when a right is granted one person it often denies a right to someone else.

B.V. “BUTCH” POLITIO

retired dentist

Hammond

Source

mm
About Mary Weyand 36089 Articles
Mary founded Scoop Tour with an aim to bring relevant and unaltered news to the general public with a specific view point for each story catered by the team. She is a proficient journalist who holds a reputable portfolio with proficiency in content analysis and research. With ample knowledge about the Automobile industry, she also contributes her knowledge for the Automobile section of the website.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*